Protecting California Dairy Families – Fighting Radical Anti-Animal Ag Legislation

About AB554

The Corporations Code sets an incredibly low bar for a group to incorporate as an SPCA (any 20 citizens), which would then authorize activists to bring meritless civil suits causing reputational and financial harm to such businesses.

The author has publicly stated the intent of the bill is to go after puppy mills and backyard breeders yet declined to accept amendments limiting the bill to “companion animals” while still protecting the right of SPCAs to bring civil action in those cases. This reveals our organizations ARE IN FACT the intended targets of the sponsors.

This bill enables ALDF to pursue its definition of “cruelty” in the civil courts – a strategy to harass or outright eliminate animal agriculture production, fairs, accredited zoos, rodeos, and other activities where animals are present in California.

California has the highest animal welfare standards in the nation. Our organizations believe those who abuse or neglect animals should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law – in criminal court where an unbiased prosecutor vets claims of animal abuse alleged by an SPCA.

Listen to the Podcast Episode

Help WUD elevate your voice in the capitol by filling out a letter to your Assembly representative!

Dear Assemblymember,

I am writing to express my strong opposition to California Assembly Bill 554 and to urge you to vote against its passage. This bill, if enacted, would have severe and detrimental consequences for various industries involving animals, including production agriculture, fairs, zoos, rodeos, and other activities. I believe it is crucial to consider the potential ramifications of this legislation and protect the interests of businesses and organizations involved.

One of the primary concerns with AB 554 is its susceptibility to abuse by extremist groups that are fundamentally opposed to animal-related industries. The bill’s provisions could be exploited by such groups to bring forth meritless civil suits against businesses, causing reputational and financial harm. The current regulations under the Corporations Code allow for the easy incorporation of groups as an SPCA, enabling activists to launch unwarranted legal actions against legitimate businesses.

Despite efforts made by concerned parties to propose amendments that align with the bill’s stated intent, they were unfortunately rejected. The author of AB 554 has publicly expressed that the bill aims to target puppy mills and backyard breeders, but they have refused amendments that would limit the bill to companion animals while preserving the right of SPCAs to take appropriate action in cases of genuine animal abuse. This refusal indicates that our organizations, which are vital to the economy and welfare of California, are indeed the intended targets of the sponsors.

The Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF), the bill’s sponsor, contends that commonplace and legal practices within the livestock industry constitute “cruelty.” AB 554 would empower ALDF to pursue its subjective definition of cruelty through civil courts, allowing them to harass or eliminate animal agricultural production, fairs, accredited zoos, rodeos, and other activities where animals are present. Such a strategy is not conducive to promoting animal welfare but rather undermines the agricultural and entertainment sectors in California.

It is important to acknowledge that all the organizations opposing this bill prioritize animal welfare. California already boasts the highest animal welfare standards in the nation, and we strongly believe that those who abuse or neglect animals should face prosecution in criminal courts, where claims of animal abuse can be thoroughly assessed by an unbiased prosecutor in cooperation with an SPCA.

In light of the aforementioned concerns and the potential adverse effects on multiple industries, I implore you to vote against California AB 554. Let us ensure that the legislative decisions we make uphold the integrity of businesses, protect the livelihoods of hardworking individuals, and maintain California’s reputation as a leader in animal welfare.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I trust that you will consider the viewpoints and concerns presented by those who oppose AB 554.